Having an app or alerts so we don't have to open the website to check for new messages.
I wish that if someone was inactive for an extended period (i.e. 3 months or so) that their profile automatically muted, so it no longer shows up until they come back.
The review period to become a professional should end instantly if the pending professional pauses their account. People are using the pause function to hide that label.
I dunno if this already exists, but an ability to hide your "last online".
I think it would be nice to have a "time spent" counter on the visitors page so we could see how long one was on our profile page before they either messaged or left.
A setting (to turn on or off) to only allow messaging from profiles that have a photo.
Better follow through on reports. My friend got wrongly reported and y’all just banned her without checking her profile to find if the report was real. That’s super lame of y’all. Some guy she didn’t respond to reported her being petty that her picture was nude. Which we all know if it was nude her profile would have not got approved in the first place. I’d like some REAL answers regarding this and how you all plan to fix it.
Less censorship
@LushCrush
Members often upload photos that are against the TOS after their profile has been approved thinking they won't get caught. The mods do not frivolously ban anyone without following up on the report and viewing the reported content personally. Your friend broke the rules either by uploading inappropriate photos and/or by breaking the TOS. It happens, frequently. The mods are not paid by the number of accounts they ban, they are not paid at all, they are volunteers.
Lastly the mods are not going to discuss her case with you. She's an adult. She can appeal the ban on her own if applicable.
@LushCrush so this must be what you were referring to in your thread towards the mods? There are lots of evidence we look at when deciding to ban someone. Be that dms on the site, screenshots, past infractions, past bookings, or yes, even photos we wish we could unsee. If your friend is part of the case I'm thinking of, then it was indeed a damming photo that did the deed. Both it and a past non platonic warning were taken into account resulting in her ban. Again, that's IF we're talking about the same case here.
@Rezz was right in saying we reserve the right not to disclose cases with other members, however, I hold no shame in admitting the recent case hit a little too close to home. A wrongful ban of a friend of mine awhile ago was part of the reason I agreed to be a mod in the first place in the hopes I could help catch things like this. If your friend is indeed whom I'm thinking of, then I've already looked into past bookings following her appeal and have been pushing privately for her account to be restored, also currently waiting on a response on how to handle the "client". No, I will not be going into more details here. If you wish to ask more about this, you can pm me. Until then, I'd advise against antagonizing the other mods further.
No y’all banned my friend who had one photo of a shirt with a entire collar. I can see this is taking the same route as most sites with jealous mods who abuse power.
My friend was new and had never had any bookings she was just approved she has not even messaged anyone back yet
@rezz take ur attitude elsewhere please. Um you don’t know what you’re talking about
@LushCrush - say what you will about mods, but when you choose to personally attack a contributing and respected Pro in the community like @Rezz , you're out of line and out of bounds. Welcome to forum timeout. [-Sid, the lazy Mod]
Don’t @ me being rude
You made a PUBLIC post, I will give you a PUBLIC response. You asked for answers and I gave them. I don't care if it's not what you wanted to hear, the mods don't carelessly ban those who follow the rules. 💅
Ah. So we weren't talking the same person. Thought I misread that, but wasn't sure lol
@LushCrush so let me get this straight. First you create an inappropriate thread to verbally attack our mod staff, now it's everyone else who has the attitude? I don't know which case you're talking about specifically but none of us ban lightly. Honest mistakes happen from time to time, but there's always a probable reason behind the bans we issue. You can politely message one of us about your friend, or your friend can make an appeal. This needless drama you're trying to create though is only going to end poorly for you.
@zerocantaloupe -
A pending pro can't pause their account. Only a mod can pause a pro's account. One of the mods can correct me if I'm wrong about that, but that has been my understanding of the "pause" function. You can't view that person's profile or contact them on the site while they are paused.
@dave31415 - every site has a TOS, even certain sites claiming "freedom!" with their "open, free, and honest global conversation" regularly removes or edits posts. We have rules and standards. This isn't anarchy, and it won't be.
@tacpmurg wrote "I dunno if this already exists, but an ability to hide your "last online"."
Is last online even accurate? Sometimes someone will send a message and I read it immediately but on a search of the surrounding location at the same time their profile is nowhere near the top of the search.
@snugbuddy I believe Last online does not update in real time. I think it does a batch update every .... I'm not sure how often. Every hour or something? It is roughly right, but as you say, not always up to the minute.
I'd like a "mark all read" button for the forums.
Have all Karma show up on the search page thumb nail instead of only if there are five or more. That way we don't have to keep clicking on the profile looking for new karma. This would be helpful if there is a cuddler with no or a few karma that I'm not sure about contacting or meeting until there is more karma. Instead of periodically clicking on the profile looking for new karma it would show on the search page. I'm not into clicking on profiles all the time. I'm not sure what the purpose is for the karma to not show up on the search page until there are five. It would make more sense to have any amount of karma to show up.
A question: is there ever any action taken as a result of these suggestions or are we just wasting our time typing?
@snugbuddy: I'm the one who suggested the "I like to cuddle while..." bit on our profiles. So I can confirm that yes, our suggestions are considered and sometimes acted upon!
@DaringSprinter ok thanks now I hope my suggestion is implemented
Deleted post
@snugbuddy it is rare for a suggestion to be implemented, mostly because the vast majority of suggestions are un-implementable or were rejected ten years ago, but it does happen. The site management keeps an eye on this thread.
The Karma number currently appears when there are a minimum of five, five-star Karma (and, I suspect, no Karma with another number of stars). Your proposal of having all Karma appearing is, in my opinion, unlikely to be accepted because if the site wanted to do it like that they would have done it already. It also gives undue prominence to recent joiners who cuddled their friend first and got them to leave a great review. The point of the system is to highlight the, ahem, star performers.
@CuddleDuncan I don't see how it would give prominence to recent joiners. If someone is interested in a particular cuddler, when they check the profile they will see the karma regardless of who wrote it. As for the "star" performers to whom cuddling is a full time big business and who have dozens upon dozens of Karma I have no interest. I know they make a lot of money and make the website a lot of money but I prefer those with more modest karma.
Add the ability to filter by "smoking" answer. I'm allergic to cigarette smoke, so the only options for me to be able to breathe are "no" and "420".
@Unscented_Lemon This is something I've been advocating for for a really long time.
@Unscented_Lemon Finally, someone else gets it as well