Is it too much to ask???

" on occasion" can also mean daily .  Perhaps you experience pain daily .  How is the reader to know .
you steered the discussion off topic in the first place with your " apologize to mark @ comment .   It is fair for me to mention , that , my edited post , appeared onscreen , ten minutes before your entry into the discussion , which means , your comment to apologize , misled other forum readers . 
I also want to point out , the " original content " of my discussion posting , contained pleasantries , and was very courteous to the, target group that the original poster , posted about . The non pro cuddler .  Want proof ? Go read lots of cuddles immediate discussion posting after mine . IF , there was any dissension , that poly claims , you really had to look . 

I_am_Polylover

@NJCuddleDevil  This is a bit off topic, but I am responding to your post.  In some cases, it can be very sad, but by no means even in a lot of cases. There are a lot of different reasons that people in relationships want to cuddle with someone outside the relationship, and few of those reasons are sad.  You should read, and maybe post on the Cuddle buddies who are in relationships thread which is intended for this topic.
♥Jim

I_am_Polylover

@sparkyblue-eyes  How can 'on occasion' mean daily?  Why do you continue to try to beat a dead horse?  I already stated that 'on occasion' means rarely to me, so why insinuate that I use it daily.  My comment that I think you owe an apology to Mark was in reference to you accusing him of fixing the CC system so that non-paid cuddlers don't receive the messages that were sent to them.  Your edited post did not appear on my screen until after I posted.  Please drop this subject and lets talk about why people don't respond to messages, which is supposed to be the topic of this thread

You owe me an explanation for what jabs  . 
I told you , on occasion can mean daily , it could mean ten times a week , with three pain episodes one day , skip one , and one the next , so on , etc 
You are accusing me of jabbing you , so , what jabs ? 
And no , my edited post appeared onscreen rten minutes before yours , I'm sorry .
you are running amuk in the nude thread , you are accusing me of jabbing you , I won't be discussing any topics with you until I get an explanation of what jabs .

You know children, I posted here to get some opinions, not to have you and your lack of social maturity duke it out online on a forum for a site we are all supposed to be kind to each other. 

If this kind kind of behavior is emblematic of how you guys behave in your typical online communication, it's no wonder women are hesitant to reply. So I guess in some f'd up way, thanks for clearing up how other morons have ruined it for the rest of us!

That was uncalled for bruin. Nobody here has ruined it for you. I've read the thread and your question has been answered very thoroughly and honestly. It's unfortunate that this site has yet to work for you as you had hoped. But calling others names is not going to help you. 

@poonie - have you read the way these two children are behaving, fighting with each other about things that have ZERO to do with the thread I began?  I don't believe it was uncalled for to call them out on taking a thread that was about something entirely different and making it about their little spat.  Not sure how it could be seen as just allowing any thread for them to make their own little boxing ring, but if that's how you feel...

Bruin I still hope you find a cuddle buddie 
good night 

Thanks SparklyBlue - actually may have had some very good luck in the last 24 hours with just that.

Good for you. I hope it works out. 

I_am_Polylover

@sparkyblue-eyes  I owe you absolutely nothing.  I already gave you a couple of examples.  The second and third line in your most recent post to me are another example.  Your edited post may very well have appeared on your screen before my post, what I said, and I repeat now is that it did not appear on my screen until after I posted.  I am done with this now.

I_am_Polylover

@bruin_alum  I sincerely apologize for my part in this.  I have repeatedly tried to get the discussion back on topic.  However,  when something is aimed directly at me, I will respond.  If I had the agreement with Mark then, that I have now, I would have only flagged sparkyblue-eyes post about the system being fixed by Mark to not let non-paid cuddlers receive messages, rather than telling him I think he owes Mark an apology, and probably the entire argument could have been avoided, so I take responsibility for that.  I am in general probably way too outspoken with my opinions, especially when I see something that is wrong.  I am trying to change that with my new agreement with Mark, but it is very difficult to do when I have so many different things aimed at me from the same group of guys who did the same thing when I was first trying to start up my cuddle party.  Now that I am moving forward with it, they are at me again.
♥Jim

Post removed as it severely broke the rules.

@poonie - and there you have it.  It has devolved into "f-ing" this being shoved up someone's "a".  Was I still out of line?

Mark

I've not really been reading this thread until now but I've just seen it flagged. As the post by @sparkyblue-eyues is a personal attack using the F word I have placed a 10-day forum ban on the account.

PS. It's a little odd seeing my name mentioned so much in this thread. I don't feel anyone owes me an apology and for the sake of clarity to those unaware, the reference to 'agreements' is referring to me asking members for a special effort to be diplomatic here to avoid returning to a period of hostility.