Do you ever reach out to other cuddle enthusiast who don’t have any pics or only if they have 1? 📸

edited December 2020 in General

They say a picture is worth a thousand words (or something like that lol) ive reached out to profiles who have zero pics but had a lot to share on their profile which ive found very intriguing (im big on profiles but the ironic part is that I don’t share too much about myself lol) -not because I’m selfish, but because I feel like I’m making myself vulnerable in doing so, I share enough & than open up in conversation.... I know many people will say “I would need to see a pic before we meet” which is virtually true for all of us, but I’m wondering if you’ll reach out or engage with someone who reaches out to you without a pic (or you with them)?

Comments

  • [Deleted User]APV (deleted user)
    edited December 2020

    Out of the 14 enthusiasts in my chosen area to whom I’ve reached out, at least three did not have pix. What matters more to me is getting a conversation going over the messaging feature on here just before we FaceTime and lastly meet in person somewhere quiet enough for us to talk. If I ever message a newer enthusiast who has yet to add a pic, and actually get a response, I’ll certainly ask for a pic.

  • I'd chat without a pic I have no idea what the current top of my list looks like, but our interactions have been awesome!! So I'm all good lol

  • Yup I agree with you both @APV & @NightShift39 ... pics can also be misleading on their own , I also tend to lean towards cuddlers who stress hygiene in their profiles , being clean - showered - clean bedding & sheets ,,, & also me sensing that they are very kind & sweet & simply awesome .. these are all very important to me & I make sure to be all those things for cuddlers I will potentially meet & hope the same. But I will also admit that at times I’ll click on a profile based on pics alone, but nothing stands out more to me than what they have written.

  • For me a pic is far far less important than what is written. I don't think I actually care about pictures. Unless they're of animals, then yes they're great.

  • I'll engage with someone without a picture because there are lots of reasons to not have a picture (mine are locked for a variety of fine reasons) and I don't have to marry the person just because I'm engaging with them. As well, I don't mind meeting a person without seeing a picture if we can figure out how to meet in a public place, but I need to really be able to feel them through their writing, which I feel I'm pretty good at. But I won't cuddle someone sight unseen, and I won't even cuddle someone after seeing their picture. I need a full in-person grok and to see that we jive not only by word, but also by energy.

  • Lots of amazing points @littermate

  • I err on the side of caution when I see a profile with no pictures. I understand that some value their anonymity, but it still leaves me wondering.

  • @sethryan44 in this case, do you prefer pics to see if they’re your type, or simply to see who they are (to put a face to the profile with looks being irrelevant?)

  • Their writing carries far more weight than pics. Though I do like having an image to pair with the words...

  • I've messaged people who don't have a profile picture. I like starting a conversation with someone, and I figure they can share a photo privately later if they don't want a photo on their profile (maybe they don't want to be so publicly visible, or some other reason).

Sign In or Register to comment.