BooksnTeas, This thread is about whatever people make it about, from whatever perspective they choose. It is not all about you, just because you started it.
I have another suggestion for the Site Moderator: add the option to mute or ignore in additon to flagging as well as the selective notification of threads.
@BooksnTeas
@sebastian23 you're incorrect, this thread was a request for something in particular. That is what the thread is for. You're off the mark with that, the idea that you can say whatever you want where you want is like a 5 year old with self-centered logic. Your incapacity to follow a conversation, which I've been taking as derailing entitlement, may also be stemming from the same place. Notice how I respond directly to your comment. Here's a test.. my comment to you is.. what was I asking for in the first thread? And your response to this??
Nope, as I said, it’s not only about you.
I do feel somewhat sorry for you since you are obviously a very troubled and confused—not to mention angry—individual, with all your talk about the “matrix of domination.” You have my sympathy, although that sympathy is somewhat strained when you drag race into your efforts to denigrate me. That was not a very smart move, although it did not surprise me.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=lA5UqUyFmT0
@sebastian23 you failed to respond correctly. The question was: what was I asking for? The reply "nope, it's only about you" would be a tangent. And the thing about bad brains in people like you, is that they are dangerous. But you can work on it. Read the text, parse it out, write in the margins, ask for support. But don't ask someone smaller than you to meet you without telling a friend who they are with, because when they ask if you understood a boundary they laid out, you will be not be capable of offering them that.
@snugglebear98 how do you make a video embed? I tried the link but it just posts a link not the video itself. Thanks man.
@littermate It played when I clicked on it. I'm on my phone. So I clicked on the share button on YouTube. I just copied the link for the video and just paste it.
Thanks @snugglebear98. So far pasting links to embed hasn't worked for me (pout).
@SoulcuddlerZ
Why is this argument still raging? Starting with an All Caps title set the mood and it went downhill from there. Enough, already.
@VN6056 ,, I disagree that this stop . Keeping discussionsgoing give more people a chance to comment , which include those who don’t log in, or view the forum, but once a month . If anything , certain thread participantscould be restrained from constant postings ,I don’t know what mechanism could be created to do that .
@SoulcuddlerZ - I'm really happy to let this thread go, the exception being if sebastion23 or someone like him wants to complete the thread with some re-assessment of their right to privacy. I'm considering that trolling my thread, and they can start a new one and let this die, or I'll be replying and reminding them this is not about looking for ways to steal their identity, but ways that a culture of instimacy-ers who are going alone with each other can do so without anonymity for the purpose of PERSONAL accountability. Sorry I used caps, I thought people who wanted to talk safety rather than just folks who regularly check the forums might be drawn in. After that I used caps to highlight concepts that generally aren't being picked up from me in the discussion, in the hopes I can get those ideas through better that way. If you can imagine allowing some white man to horrifically mock your concerns about physical safety and harp on some tangent about keeping their identity private.. I suppose power to you if that's how you'd view it. But when some jerk does that to me, it's been important for me to stand my ground. Call it what you have to do to get heard in a man's world.. I didn't make the rules, but I sure am not going to be personally belittled by someone who holds a violent backward ideology.
also @SoulcuddlerZ , you are listed as a moderater. You stepped in and I'm wondering what if the guidelines for moderators include stepping in when a person is first attacked on a thread? You did didn't call out the person who mocked me for having concerns for physical safety with strangers in a forum whose policies address personal safety in terms of identity theft. You didn't step in when after another woman came to defend me and this person then shut down her opinion with insulting women who are not attractive. Seems the moderator is not trying to moderate a discussion in favor of physical safety with anonymous people.
(MOD) Comment removed - personal attack. Member subject to temporary/indefinite forum ban. [SoulcuddlerZ]
@BooksnTeas you are welcome to flag posts that you feel violate forum rules.
On another note, it's an unfortunate reality that some discussions that started with intention for good discussion can degenerate into entertainment for the demented.
Closed. 13 NOV 2019 12:05 EST